it would seem to me no matter what colour/race the sailor was he was gonna get a kicking and the very fact he walked away from 20 lads suposedly beating on him says three things he was as hard as nails,they were crap fighters or the asault was grossly over hyped to make prosecuting force seem hard on race crime.
You really really dont want to take in whats written do you :doh:doh
Fact:
They shouted "Paki" at him.
Fact:
They fought with him
Then consider:
[FONT="]Section 28 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 provides a definition of the term 'racially or religiously aggravated' for the purposes of [/FONT]
[FONT="]section 29[/FONT][FONT="] (aggravated assaults), [/FONT]
[FONT="]section 30[/FONT][FONT="] (aggravated criminal damage), [/FONT]
[FONT="]section 31[/FONT][FONT="] (aggravated public order) and [/FONT]
[FONT="]section 32[/FONT][FONT="] (aggravated harassment). [/FONT]
[FONT="]28(1) An offence is racially or religiously aggravated for the purposes of sections 29 to 32 if-[/FONT]
[FONT="](a) at the time of committing the offence, or immediately before or after doing so, the offender demonstrates towards the victim of the offence hostility based on the victim's membership (or presumed membership) of a racial or religious group; or
(b) the offence is motivated (wholly or partly) by hostility towards members of a racial or religious group based on their membership of that group.[/FONT]
So whats pimped up , ambiguous or anything to do with anyone being "a crap fighter" in there :nenau