Caught by the Fuzz AGAIN !

Nissan 4x4 Owners Club Forum

Help Support Nissan 4x4 Owners Club Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

makeitfit

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 27, 2008
Messages
15,112
Chuffing, twonking, big nose, plod pulled me over again today:(
It's getting to be harassment I'm not impressed:eek:
So does anyone know about the small print regarding tyre law?:augie
Mr Fuzzywuuzzy said the the whole tyre must be within the arch, while I argued it's only the tread that counts:eek:
A friend was nicked recently for his tyres sticking out too far, but he was told it's only the tread bit that counts, hence my belief I was OK.
Obviously big nose plod sees it differently:confused:
He also dipped my tank:eek: I asked him when I'd have it back and he looked confused:doh I said that's about a £1 there mate:(
Hey ho, the joys of the police state.................................only last week we were snow angels on mercy missions all over the place, but normal service is resumed :(
 
Mr Fuzzywuuzzy said the the whole tyre must be within the arch, while I argued it's only the tread that counts:eek:
A friend was nicked recently for his tyres sticking out too far, but he was told it's only the tread bit that counts, hence my belief I was OK.


The hole tyre MUST be covered by the arch
icon8.gif
:(


Mine are now :D :thumbs :augie :lol
 
an awkward one that, i know some one who got stoped and taken to court, who then got off again as it was a standard fit wheel and tyre on a lotus edition isuzu trooper.

I have been dipped so many times i loose count, usualy not by the police though, customs and excise are usualy the culprits and come out with some lovely comments for example
"its white, your lucky" not lucky just an average law abiding citizen, bloody cheek

the biggest laugh was them trying to dip a trooper despite me telling them it was petrol!

having said that i have got away with enough things, so swings and roundabaouts i suppose ;)
 
Chuffing, twonking, big nose, plod pulled me over again today:(
It's getting to be harassment I'm not impressed:eek:
So does anyone know about the small print regarding tyre law?:augie
Mr Fuzzywuuzzy said the the whole tyre must be within the arch, while I argued it's only the tread that counts:eek:
A friend was nicked recently for his tyres sticking out too far, but he was told it's only the tread bit that counts, hence my belief I was OK.
Obviously big nose plod sees it differently:confused:
He also dipped my tank:eek: I asked him when I'd have it back and he looked confused:doh I said that's about a £1 there mate:(
Hey ho, the joys of the police state.................................only last week we were snow angels on mercy missions all over the place, but normal service is resumed :(

well pete, you know what to do the next time it snows, fu**em, i would'nt help them anyway, do them a favour, and they will still stab you in the back.
no give and take with them mate. :banghead
 
well pete, you know what to do the next time it snows, fu**em, i would'nt help them anyway, do them a favour, and they will still stab you in the back.
no give and take with them mate. :banghead
Oh Please, please, please can I have a call from plod for help? Just once, and I'd piss myself on the phone :D
"I have a dream" :rolleyes:
 
I guess this means if you saw a plod mobil in a snow drift you'd drive past and leave him there to miss his break:D

Jim T
 
I guess this means if you saw a plod mobil in a snow drift you'd drive past and leave him there to miss his break:D

Jim T
No I think I'd brake hard and not miss him :lol
"Oh dear woops ociffer, I appear to have accidently skidded all over your vulva!
I'll call for help. Buyee......................." :augie
Ah, still dreaming:rolleyes:
 
Final answer - - -

Council Directive 78/549/EEC of 12 June 1978 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the wheel guards of motor vehicles

2.1.2. The rear of the wheel guards must not terminate above a horizontal plane 150 mm above the axis of rotation of the wheels (as measured at the wheel centres) and furthermore the intersection of the edge of the wheel guard with this plane (point A, figure 1) must lie outside the median longitudinal plane of the tyre, or in the case of twin wheels the median longitudinal plane of the outermost tyre.

2.1.3. The contour and location of the wheel guards shall be such that they are as close to the tyre as possible ; and in particular within the part formed by the radial planes referred to in 2.1.1, they shall satisfy the following requirements: 2.1.3.1. the projection - situated in the vertical plane of the tyre axis - of the depth (p) of the outer edge of the wheel guards, measured in the vertical longitudinal plane passing through the centre of the tyre, must be at least 30 mm. This depth (p) may be reduced progressively to zero at the radial planes specified in 2.1.1;


In short, the wheel must NOT protrude more than 30mm past the edge of the mudguard.

Full webiste for the legislation can be found here
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31978L0549:EN:NOT
 
But if the Officer thinks that your vehicle is dangerous because of the mods then he may issue you a ticket anyway and leave it up to the court to decide.

If it goes to court and he says is dangerous and you dont , thats prob enough to get a conviction.

Would it pass an MOT like that ?
 
was it laptop again who pulled you.

proper coppers dipping tanks.... dont think so , thats a tax issue not a police issue.

as for the tyres ive said it so many times always keep them in the arch then there is no need for roadside disputes.
4 tyres sticking out is 4x3 points. instant ban

why even risk it


as for harrasment, probably but if your card is marked (and id guess it is now) your stuffed
options are
sell it and get another one
get a cherry plate - wont last long cos itll show up that your the owner

or regester it in someone elses name - like what i do :D

but first cover the bloody wheels up.


you know yourself you pissed laptop off , when he went to court over your licence . so if he dont win today , he will one day .
he has all the time in the world to get at you. its his job.


in summery we both knew they were border line , open to dispute by the coppers. you knew the risk . and gambled ...... and they picked it up


so cover the bloody things up


if you want arches you can pinch my shogun body kit if you like (replace it later ) i dont need it right now .
its a full set and round the side of my house . im back a week today
but help yourself while im away

wish i could be more possitive . but the coppers down that part of wales are notoriously tossers , so not worth the risk
 
Final answer - - -

Council Directive 78/549/EEC of 12 June 1978 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the wheel guards of motor vehicles

2.1.2. The rear of the wheel guards must not terminate above a horizontal plane 150 mm above the axis of rotation of the wheels (as measured at the wheel centres) and furthermore the intersection of the edge of the wheel guard with this plane (point A, figure 1) must lie outside the median longitudinal plane of the tyre, or in the case of twin wheels the median longitudinal plane of the outermost tyre.

2.1.3. The contour and location of the wheel guards shall be such that they are as close to the tyre as possible ; and in particular within the part formed by the radial planes referred to in 2.1.1, they shall satisfy the following requirements: 2.1.3.1. the projection - situated in the vertical plane of the tyre axis - of the depth (p) of the outer edge of the wheel guards, measured in the vertical longitudinal plane passing through the centre of the tyre, must be at least 30 mm. This depth (p) may be reduced progressively to zero at the radial planes specified in 2.1.1;


In short, the wheel must NOT protrude more than 30mm past the edge of the mudguard.

Full webiste for the legislation can be found here
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31978L0549:EN:NOT

30mm is not what its says (that is referring to the depth of the wheel arch ie how much space upwards there is in it), but anyway its irrelevant those rules are for homologating a new car for sale within te EU and do not effect cars once they are actually on the road etc. I was once sent a link to a police and despite months f discussion they could not find a specific law governing tyres beyond arches etc.

But as you rightly say - they just do you for dangerous condition.
 
30mm is not what its says (that is referring to the depth of the wheel arch ie how much space upwards there is in it), but anyway its irrelevant those rules are for homologating a new car for sale within te EU and do not effect cars once they are actually on the road etc. I was once sent a link to a police and despite months f discussion they could not find a specific law governing tyres beyond arches etc.

But as you rightly say - they just do you for dangerous condition.

That was from a police forum , that is how they are viewing it , but even they are not quite sure about the rules
 
I will help anyone in the Snow, except a copper!
Well I lie...

"yes officer i do recover, its £50 instant call out charge, £30 fuel usage charge, £20 strop charge, £50 few beers charge... that'll be £150 CASH please and i'll happilly tow you from that drift 10 yds up the road... "

Learnt my lesson a few years back with piggy wigs, recovered a stuck mate of a road which was closed due to snow. When I got back to the open road there was Mr Plod sat nice and warm in his disco with disco lights flashing waiting to give us a bollocking. I asked "if you knew someone was stranded why did you not assist" which he replied "I should not get cocky young man, and he should not have been down there in the first place"
He didnt do us, but then I dont think he actually had anything to do us for. I would have fought it all the way if he had though... cant see how i'd be done for recovering someone stranded in extreme weather :nono
 
Just had a look at your photos too, the tight barstuard!!! Looks like someone does have it in for you :(
I think just about all the modified trucks in my club have wheels as wide! My Suzuki included, the wheels protruding out of the extended arches around 1" and its gone through MOTs like that. I was told it was legal because of the extended arches... oops! lol
 
i dont hink the protruding tyres are an MOT thing, but that doesn't mean it isn't somehting you can get done for their is a huge void between the MOT and the law. And even if not you would have to prove the car was still exactly as it was presented for MOT

Mot rules have some degree of interpretaiotn by the tester, and the law has the same by the police and the courts, in fact it seems a lot of people can use it to suit themselve, exept me of course :doh

though i do agree with the advice, of just cover them up, you will never win, it's not worth getting in trouble over!
 
As a senile old fart ..... About 40 years ago, while living in Liverpool, I was working as a fleet tyre fitter for Associated biscuits in Long Lane, Aintree. One evening, Plod ( Dai book & pencil), stopped me for a blown number-plate light, and insisted on checking everything else on the car. While he was doing this, I checked his tyres on his Panda car, and found two tyres "As bald as a baby's backside".
As he got his pad out to book me for the number-plate light ( He couldn't find anything else wrong ) , I said to him "When you've done that, give me the book, and I'll give you a ticket too".
I said to him " I'm a fleet tyre fitter, and you've got 2 bald tyres on your car. I've got the registration number of your car, the serial numbers of the tyres and location on the car, your shoulder number, time and place" . Needless to say, he was really Pissed off with me, and after some "under-his-breath" comments, let me on my way, with a warning to get the bulb replaced PRONTO !!!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top