LED Side Light Bulb's

[jims-terrano]

Has anyone ever used this type of bulb in the Ebay link below?

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/2-x-Xenon...arts_Vehicles_CarParts_SM&hash=item3f11bab44a

Does anyone know if there is any MOT implications when fitting the white LED replacements.

 

[clivvy]

nope, but as far as I know, they are fine MOT wise.

 

[R1cho]

mot man told me to take mine out

 

[Lazy-Ferret]

I fitted these, and so far they are great.

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/2x-501-W5W-T10-HIGH-POWER-CREE-XENON-PURE-WHITE-SIDELIGHT-WEDGE-LED-BULBS-/310407328240?pt=UK_CarsParts_Vehicles_CarParts_SM&hash=item4845b7f1f0

I was told to avoid the type you linked to, as on the T2, they are inside the head lamp, close to the dip/main beam bulb, and the heat generated by the main beam can melt the surface mount solder making them fall apart.. one guy even said the LED's exploded... Not so sure about that bit, but I could see the solder melting.

Not sure about the MOT yet, as they are basically the right colour, and do the job, I can't see it being a problem, will just wait and see, and just make sure I have the legal ones I removed are in car just in case.

 

[briggie]

m.o.t. testers manual below jim if you wanna peruse it
http://www.transportoffice.gov.uk/c...nualsandguides/mottestingmanualsandguides.htm

 

[briggie]

this bit below deals with indicators

http://www.transportoffice.gov.uk/c...nualsandguides/mottestingmanualsandguides.htm

no it doesnt lol , look under class 4 , and then lights , as far as i can see the only reason for a fail is if the light is of a different colour

 

[jims-terrano]

Some interesting points and it sounds very much as if even testers are not sure. This time they are not for the T2 and the sidelamps although part of the main lamp are in a seperate compartment.

May be easier not to worry and just buy a simple replacement bulb instead.

 

[96terrano]

have a look at my thread jim:thumb2

http://www.nissan4x4ownersclub.com/forum/showthread.php?t=17677

 

[Kishada]

Try this link.

I personally use these and I would not fail you if you presented a vehicle with them for MOT nor should any other tester. The main point is that they are white ie the correct colour.

 

[glanrichbex]

From an insurance underwriters point of view, if the other party reports that your signals were not clear e.g. brake lights / indicators / dazzled by very bright headlights / and on examination it appears you have altered the specification that vehicle was fitted with at the time of manufacture, it could be argued that you have made an unauthorised modification.

Its pointless trying to convince the insurance company the lighting was better than originally fitted - It could also be argued that if the vehicle was fitted with the original specified lighting then the accident may well have been avoided.

This is not a likely scenario for your average bump but in the event of a more serious accident, there would be a higher profile investigation and inspection of the vehicle. Insurance companies like profit and where there's a chance to riggle out they will because it saves them £££££s.

 

[millie2]

I Use LEDs bought off a member and have had no probs with last 2 tests

 

[jims-terrano]

You know what this makes sense as the insurance companies are in the main crooks:doh

From an insurance underwriters point of view, if the other party reports that your signals were not clear e.g. brake lights / indicators / dazzled by very bright headlights / and on examination it appears you have altered the specification that vehicle was fitted with at the time of manufacture, it could be argued that you have made an unauthorised modification.

Its pointless trying to convince the insurance company the lighting was better than originally fitted - It could also be argued that if the vehicle was fitted with the original specified lighting then the accident may well have been avoided.

This is not a likely scenario for your average bump but in the event of a more serious accident, there would be a higher profile investigation and inspection of the vehicle. Insurance companies like profit and where there's a chance to riggle out they will because it saves them £££££s.

 

[jims-terrano]

Jeez thems bright

have a look at my thread jim:thumb2

http://www.nissan4x4ownersclub.com/forum/showthread.php?t=17677

 

[glanrichbex]

You know what this makes sense as the insurance companies are in the main crooks:doh

OHHHHH YESSSS!!! :thumbs

 

[96terrano]

Jeez thems bright

A little, and all that cost me £8.57

 

[jims-terrano]

A little, and all that cost me £8.57

And your insurance?????

 

[96terrano]

And your insurance?????

Won't effect It

 

[briggie]

Won't effect It

have you actually told them ?

 

[arcascomp]

From an insurance underwriters point of view, if the other party reports that your signals were not clear e.g. brake lights / indicators / dazzled by very bright headlights / and on examination it appears you have altered the specification that vehicle was fitted with at the time of manufacture, it could be argued that you have made an unauthorised modification.

Its pointless trying to convince the insurance company the lighting was better than originally fitted - It could also be argued that if the vehicle was fitted with the original specified lighting then the accident may well have been avoided.

This is not a likely scenario for your average bump but in the event of a more serious accident, there would be a higher profile investigation and inspection of the vehicle. Insurance companies like profit and where there's a chance to riggle out they will because it saves them £££££s.

But then, if you were to be taken to court, the insurance companies would have to prove beyond reasonable doubt, that the accident wouldn't have happened if the lights were standard. As they can't actually prove a negative they will eventually give up.

Mate works for a quote me happy kind of company and he is shocked at what they have to pay out for sometimes as they don't want to lose in court.

 

[96terrano]

have you actually told them ?

Nah