Insurance claim

[lacroupade]

cant be asrsed to argue it because there isnt an argument.

Do a bit of research.

If the RTA does not require ins , use of it can not be enforced. Fact.

It becomes a civil claim and the PERSON pursued

Such nuances do apply to car parks. Fact.

Where youve got mixed up and enter self congratulatory mode is where you miss the point where i say i dont know what still does and doesnt apply.

Certainly wasnt and isnt an old wives tale. Fact.

what a girlie conclusion ...you've clearly had too much Lucozade haven't you :lol:lol:lol

anyway I think you'll find if you check PROPERLY lol)that any private land that the public have access to i.e. a car park, is regarded as the same as the public highway with regards to insurance etc. In other words Mr Cock was perfectly at liberty to take the course of action he did. We are not talking about the law here, I never was, simply insurance procedures and processes.

Thats my position and unless someone can provide irrefutable documented professional evidence to the contrary, then it stands ....yahboosuckstoyou ...withknobson. :kissy:kissy:kissy