Did I miss much. What channel was it on?
You didn't miss anything mate. Its been in all the papers and new sites and thats sickening enough to read.
I don't understand why a TV company would broadcast this stuff TBH - apart from anything else (no offence) you need to be a bit insensitive to be able to sit through it....it should be handed straight to the police and authorities and then the telly company can report on the trial can't they.
It's just another flavour of reality tv. Cheap to produce and plays on peoples' voyeuristic tendencies. I think the tv comapanies do hand over the videos to the police in most of these cases, but I agree that it is unecessary to broadcast them in the first place.With respect I disagree with your position regarding this. In societies where there is no 'free press' these types of abuses continue unchecked for decades i.e chlidrens care homes in Ceaușescu's Romania. Voyeuristic it may be, but arguably they have done the patients a service by airing the documentary, and at least there wasn't an opportunity for any official body to silence it beforehand. It's not an ideal system, but it kind of works.
Don't forget the whistle was blown several times by a nurse, without any action being taken!
Alan
It's just another flavour of reality tv. Cheap to produce and plays on peoples' voyeuristic tendencies. I think the tv comapanies do hand over the videos to the police in most of these cases, but I agree that it is unecessary to broadcast them in the first place.That's OkWith respect I disagree with your position regarding this. In societies where there is no 'free press' these types of abuses continue unchecked for decades i.e chlidrens care homes in Ceaușescu's Romania. Voyeuristic it may be, but arguably they have done the patients a service by airing the documentary, and at least there wasn't an opportunity for any official body to silence it beforehand. It's not an ideal system, but it kind of works.
Don't forget the whistle was blown several times by a nurse, without any action being taken!
Alan
It's just another flavour of reality tv. Cheap to produce and plays on peoples' voyeuristic tendencies. I think the tv comapanies do hand over the videos to the police in most of these cases but I agree that it is unecessary to broadcast them in the first place.
Makes you wonder, though, that if the tv companies can do secret filming in these places, why not the police or local authorities? I am assuming that the tv companies only go in because of a tip off about what is going on, so surely a tip off to police could be acted on in the same manner?
In reality, it probably should be the police doing the filming and the investigation.But how long after filming do they hand them over? it should be as soon as they get the footage, not wait so its good TV.
And the police can only act after a crime is commited, not before. Its a shame i know, but its how it is.
(PS, Liam, this is not a dig at you mate, just my oppinion)
Enter your email address to join: