If the 2.7 is claimed to do 27mpg and the 3.0 is claimed to do 34mpg, that is a big percentage difference.
By my calculations it means £100 in the 3.0 would get you as far as £125 in the 2.7.
I know we are not after fuel economy by using these type of vehicles but it does still come into it. (yes I know there are lots of variables when trying to achieve the above claims)
It seems to me that most folk on here use these trucks in situations where they are going to be covered in mud, oily folk in and out and worst of all....kids! Just seems damned odd to make the interior cream coloured. Then again, I am a scruffy farmer so maybe my views are from a different perspective than most. Seems a lot of 4x4s are bought by city dwellers looking for an armoured personnel carrier these days.
I think I have decided on a black 3.0 Terrano with black interior, not fussed about transmission but £3500-4000.
Tall order I know but if I wait one will turn up. Let's see if the money burns a hole in my pocket first.
By my calculations it means £100 in the 3.0 would get you as far as £125 in the 2.7.
I know we are not after fuel economy by using these type of vehicles but it does still come into it. (yes I know there are lots of variables when trying to achieve the above claims)
It seems to me that most folk on here use these trucks in situations where they are going to be covered in mud, oily folk in and out and worst of all....kids! Just seems damned odd to make the interior cream coloured. Then again, I am a scruffy farmer so maybe my views are from a different perspective than most. Seems a lot of 4x4s are bought by city dwellers looking for an armoured personnel carrier these days.
I think I have decided on a black 3.0 Terrano with black interior, not fussed about transmission but £3500-4000.
Tall order I know but if I wait one will turn up. Let's see if the money burns a hole in my pocket first.