|
The Clubs Virtual Pub For general chat, so come on in and pull up a chair. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
16-11-2009, 21:26 | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South of France
Vehicle: '03 LWB MK.4 3Ltr T2
Posts: 421
|
Economy/emissions 2.7 versus 3ltr?
I'm intending to upgrade my '96 T2, to a younger model, probably a 2005 or similar. Has anyone any data (or info re where I can find it) on the different fuel consumption and CO2 emissions figures of the later 2.7 versus the 3ltr T2s? Also I understand that there are some 'bolt ons' that can improve power/performance/economy of the 2.7. Any info welcome.
Rgds CL |
16-11-2009, 21:42 | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: WALES
Posts: 6,295
|
you need the lurrrrveglove hes mr stats on cars and stuff... to the point of annoyance
no ask paul he will know. if not he will find out but do you have the same tax issues over there emmisions etc |
16-11-2009, 22:45 | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: All hail to the Glove of Love...
Posts: 9,212
|
Or you can fiddle about here.....
http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/review...93.aspx?Page=7 COLIN, found my lovegloves today while emptying the storage unit..mmmmmmm! |
16-11-2009, 23:48 | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: WALES
Posts: 6,295
|
Quote:
|
|
17-11-2009, 20:42 | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South of France
Vehicle: '03 LWB MK.4 3Ltr T2
Posts: 421
|
Hi Guys
Thanks for the come backs and links, I'll be doing some research on them. Extreme - Yes there's an issue on emissions here in France. If it is over 250g/km (I think?) you have to pay an annual tax. If below - no tax. The 3ltr auto T2 is over that but I think (hope) the manual is 240g/km. That's why I'm hovering between a 2.7 and 3ltr. I'd prefer the bigger engine 'cos I'd like the extra power but not at the expense of paying a tax every year if I don't have to. Rgds CL |
17-11-2009, 20:47 | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: West Yorkshire
Vehicle: 2005 Terrano II 2.7tdi SE
Posts: 568
|
Get a 2.7 and fit a Tunit box?
|
17-11-2009, 21:13 | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South of France
Vehicle: '03 LWB MK.4 3Ltr T2
Posts: 421
|
Hi Guys
Quick update - just done the preliminary research - 2.7 manual = 260 g/km, versus 3.0 Di manual = 240 g/km, plus better MPG (litres per 100 km over here). As the cut off point for annual tax here in France is 250 g/km, it looks like I'll be going for a 3.0 Di. Anyone got a good low mileage 'left hooker' for sale?????? Rgds CL |
17-11-2009, 21:16 | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: essex
Vehicle: nissan mistral 27td
Posts: 1,043
|
new truck
keep the 2.7td less electrics to go wrong.
push the pedal harder hit the redline every now and then paulp |
17-11-2009, 21:18 | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South of France
Vehicle: '03 LWB MK.4 3Ltr T2
Posts: 421
|
Hey Paulp
I make you right - may just do that - if the tin worm don't get her too soon!! Rgds CL |
17-11-2009, 22:54 | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: essex
Vehicle: nissan mistral 27td
Posts: 1,043
|
new truck
good point Capt the tin worm does like the japanese metal, ok the newer the better resistance but they like it
paulp |
|
|