10-04-2012, 13:15 | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Staffs
Vehicle: '02 Terrano TDI sport lwb
Posts: 3,787
|
3.0 se swb van
|
10-04-2012, 15:42 | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Central England, in the Heart of the Black Country
Vehicle: T2 2004 TDI SE LWB
Posts: 7,740
|
I'm tempted, but really not sure about the 3.0 engine
|
10-04-2012, 15:49 | #3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Cheshire
Vehicle: Terrano ll lwb 3.0 DI SVE
Posts: 28
|
|
10-04-2012, 15:52 | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Central England, in the Heart of the Black Country
Vehicle: T2 2004 TDI SE LWB
Posts: 7,740
|
the power doesn't worry me, it's the technical issues! I know they were mostly troll related but my 2.7 is powerful enough and runs on SVO at 90p litre
|
10-04-2012, 16:25 | #5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Cheshire
Vehicle: Terrano ll lwb 3.0 DI SVE
Posts: 28
|
I use my 3.0 for towing a boat, the extra horses come in very handy!
Fuel consumption is a little better than the 2.7. A friend has a 98 2.7 which runs very well but seems a bit agricultural compared to the 3.0. All in all both good cars.... |
10-04-2012, 16:30 | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Isle of Axholme
Vehicle: T2, 2.7 TDI 2002 lwb
Posts: 955
|
Farmer near me has one, 56 plate I think. runs his on one third derv two thirds used rapeseed oil. Says he gets 32mpg on average over the last couple of years. David.
|
10-04-2012, 16:36 | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Staffs
Vehicle: '02 Terrano TDI sport lwb
Posts: 3,787
|
I'd love it tbh
|
10-04-2012, 17:01 | #8 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Cheshire
Vehicle: Terrano ll lwb 3.0 DI SVE
Posts: 28
|
If it was a lwb I'd've been tempted, but for now i'll stick with my tranny.
|
10-04-2012, 17:56 | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Central England, in the Heart of the Black Country
Vehicle: T2 2004 TDI SE LWB
Posts: 7,740
|
Quote:
and most sources of information concerning MPG rate the 3l at the same as the 2.7 have you had a 2.7? |
|
10-04-2012, 18:05 | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: South Bucks
Vehicle: Terrano 3.0 SVE 2005
Posts: 3,499
|
Quote:
As stated though, both engines are great |
|
10-04-2012, 18:08 | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Central England, in the Heart of the Black Country
Vehicle: T2 2004 TDI SE LWB
Posts: 7,740
|
yep, it is said that all the problems with the 3.0 engine were sorted by the time they went into a T2 I'm just nervous and mean
|
10-04-2012, 18:11 | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: South Bucks
Vehicle: Terrano 3.0 SVE 2005
Posts: 3,499
|
Would be a steal if you could get it for around the £2000 mark though
|
10-04-2012, 18:16 | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Central England, in the Heart of the Black Country
Vehicle: T2 2004 TDI SE LWB
Posts: 7,740
|
odd thing is though that I have looked at a few late LWB estates with a view to using one as a tow car as part of our collection of cars and I have found a few dogs. One was a 2006 that had intermittent electrical problems that beat a Bosch specialist and the local Nissan dealer. Notably rough tick over and ABS light coming on. So it could be either a bargain or a headache - are they just trying to shift it on while it's working? or am i being paranoid again?
|
10-04-2012, 19:19 | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: cupar scotland
Vehicle: terrano II SWB 2.7 (2002)
Posts: 431
|
Quote:
the power in the back end is crazy plenty of POWER SLIDING on the roundabouts buy it buy it buy it |
|
10-04-2012, 19:33 | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Mid-Wales
Vehicle: Maverick 2.7 - Patrol 4.2
Posts: 5,645
|
2.7 anyday, loads of spares
|
|
|