congratulations rick and maggs

[solarman216]

no mate he stood no chance, typical of getting it wrong, although the councils arguments are not correct either, but it matters little there was no way he was going to get that on the 4 year rule regarding existing buildings, you have to be fair, put up a farm building, call it existing and convert it, not really playing the game, on the other side of the coin had the enforcement officer here today re our letter about living in the converted stables, you should have seen his face when he walked in and saw our place, he was visibly shocked and the tone went off straight away to the point of giving suggestions how to avoid enforcement action by applying for a lawful development certificate now and he will send me the forms, in the end it is better to get this over with now cos when it is done it is all done and dusted, Rick

[lacroupade]

Originally Posted by solarman216

no mate he stood no chance, typical of getting it wrong, although the councils arguments are not correct either, but it matters little there was no way he was going to get that on the 4 year rule regarding existing buildings, you have to be fair, put up a farm building, call it existing and convert it, not really playing the game, on the other side of the coin had the enforcement officer here today re our letter about living in the converted stables, you should have seen his face when he walked in and saw our place, he was visibly shocked and the tone went off straight away to the point of giving suggestions how to avoid enforcement action by applying for a lawful development certificate now and he will send me the forms, in the end it is better to get this over with now cos when it is done it is all done and dusted, Rick

well you have to admit his was a pretty dodgy and devious effort, not quite playing cricket what? LOL