Whats this supposed to be

[cncfabs]

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/NISSAN-TE...3501354?pt=Automobiles_UK&hash=item3f1f07242a

 

[stinka]

Looks like a Terrano mate

 

[Lazy-Ferret]

Suspicious!! and a pig to insure, I guess.


Why would you bother to mention it is a 2005 Terrano on a 1994 Maveric chassis, but give no explanation as to how it got like that???

Does that make it a T3???:lol

 

[cncfabs]

Looks like a Terrano mate

Nope its a 1994 3.0 litre maverick with 2005 terrano body shell:lol

 

[cncfabs]

Suspicious!! and a pig to insure, I guess.


Why would you bother to mention it is a 2005 Terrano on a 1994 Maveric chassis, but give no explanation as to how it got like that???

Does that make it a T3???:lol

my guess is he nicked a 2005 terrano and put it on a 1994 maverick chassis

 

[stinka]

If its stolen he wouldn't be as stupid to eBay it

I reckon the 2005 was written off somehow so he swapped the body onto the mav chassis

 

[firebobby]

It looks like a late Terrano with a few Ford badges stuck on, but the wheels look like they have the Nissan badge..strange

 

[cncfabs]

The most interesting bit is the hpi report showing it as 1994 maverick and hpi clear which it clearly isnt

 

[96terrano]

interesting, i wonder what the reason is that it was put on a maverick chassis? surly a 2005 wouldn't rot that quick?

 

[terranobreakershropshire]

its called a 'ringer' !!

 

[(RIP) PLANK]

ringer or not it is certainly a 'LASH UP' and does it now have police interest hence the sale? if it is registered as a 1996 vehicle it wouldn't take a genius to work it out! Maybe it's not even on a 1996 chases at all, just a legit 1996 chassis number :augie

On the plus side It is pretty cheap though :thumb2

 

[Fez_uk]

probably just using the old chassis numbers? Would that make it cheaper to tax compared to something 05?

 

[firebobby]

Just asked him why it's been played with, will let you know what he says.
This just doesn't sound right

 

[96terrano]

its called a 'ringer' !!

whats that?:nenau

 

[firebobby]

My 2005 VIN no starts VSKT this one starts VSKN, it's very close for a 1994 vehicle don't you think:nenau

 

[96terrano]

Just asked him why it's been played with

yeah, same here

 

[Thomas-the-Terrano2]

so how do you insure a 3.0 mav which never existed in that format as group 10

when an early 2.7 tdi was a 10, my late 2.7 tdi is a 12 and as recall a 3.0 is a 14.

plus would early chassis have abs etc as my 96 didnt on SR trim.

 

[(RIP) PLANK]

so how do you insure a 3.0 mav which never existed in that format as group 10

when an early 2.7 tdi was a 10, my late 2.7 tdi is a 12 and as recall a 3.0 is a 14.

plus would early chassis have abs etc as my 96 didnt on SR trim.

It would be interesting to have a look at it and its log book :augie

 

[Lazy-Ferret]

If you go and check out it's MOT history, it had fails and advisories as long as your arm... Usual things, by all accounts, but welding, suspension links and corrosion were a major part of them.

http://motinfo.direct.gov.uk/internet/jsp/ECHID-Internet-History-Request.jsp

Enter the Reg... NIL7332

and in the second box enter... 325947952282 from the MOT cert

Says it is a 31/12/1994 Ford Maverick

On 05/09/2011

Reason(s) for refusal to issue Certificate

Nearside Front rear bush Tie bar/rod rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2) **DANGEROUS**

Offside Front rear bush Tie bar/rod rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2) **DANGEROUS**

Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1) **DANGEROUS**

Both main feed Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c) **DANGEROUS**

Offside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c) **DANGEROUS**

Rear Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2) **DANGEROUS**

Rear Exhaust has part of the system excessively deteriorated (7.1.1a) **DANGEROUS**

Nearside Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3) **DANGEROUS**

Offside outer sill Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded (5.2.6) **DANGEROUS**

Advisory Notice issued

Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)

Front x 2 Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)

Nearside sill Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.2.6)

Fuel pipe/s corroded **DANGEROUS**


Just as a mater if interest, how can the last one be an advisory, when it actually says it is dangerous???

 

[Kamsin]

It had only done 24,000 miles in 2006....12 years after it was made? :augie

I think this Truck should have AVOID in big letters stamped all over it.

Also notice that its for sale a couple of months after the MOT has been passed, so there is now no come back on the tester. I have seen this scam before, they get a ropy MOT and store the car for a while then sell it so the MOT man is not held at fault.