|
The Clubs Virtual Pub For general chat, so come on in and pull up a chair. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
20-02-2008, 20:15 | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: South
Posts: 1,748
|
Another Maverick & (Terrano) review.
When in the early 1990s sales of 4x4s started to boom, Ford, the biggest car brand in Britain, was in an awkward position. While Vauxhall, Honda, Daihatsu and Land Rover all had off-roaders to offer, Ford had nothing.
The company had a choice: develop a new 4x4 from scratch, which would be time-consuming and costly, or plump for a “quick and dirty” solution by working with another manufacturer to launch a model with dual badging. The decision was simple and the result was the Ford Maverick and its thinly disguised brother the Nissan Terrano. Launched in July 1993, the Ford Maverick was available with a choice of two engines, a 2.4 litre 122bhp petrol unit or a 2.7 litre turbodiesel producing 98bhp. Stories of heavy fuel consumption on the petrol model started to spread and soon most buyers were opting for the diesel. Revisions to the engine line-up came in 1996 and coincided with a revised front grille and some enhancements to the list of standard equipment. The diesel gained a 25% boost in power, nudging it to 123bhp, while the 2.4 litre petrol engine bizarrely suffered a power reduction to 114bhp. So if you want a diesel get a post-1996 model but if you want a petrol get a pre-1996 one. The later vehicles have a chrome front grille, round headlamps and an air scoop on the bonnet. The five-door Maverick is the most popular second-hand, thanks to a third row of seats that transforms the vehicle into a seven-seater — expect to pay about £500-£750 more for an equivalent five-door than for a three-door. The Maverick comes with serious off-road potential with a limited slip differential, selectable four-wheel drive with a two-speed transfer box and automatic locking front hubs. With this in mind it’s important to check a used Maverick for signs of off-road excursions. Signs are scuffed sills, scraped exhaust boxes and mud-filled underbody cavities. Check that the vehicle drives straight and doesn’t pull left or right under braking — an indication that steering and suspension could be damaged. On the road the Maverick is a reasonable drive. It feels a little agricultural compared with more modern 4x4s, but while it’s certainly no Land Rover Defender the good visibility and high riding position give the impression of authority. Reliability is pretty good but an abused Maverick can bite back. It’s essential that engine oil is changed regularly, especially on diesels. In 1999 production of the Nissan-derived Ford Maverick ceased. By the time the second-generation Maverick arrived in 2001 it was something of a white elephant and the absence of any diesel option was tacit acknowledgment by Ford that it was going to have a short life. So the original Maverick remains something of an oddball — a Nissan with a different name. Perhaps we should thank the Maverick for encouraging Ford’s investment in Land Rover and Range Rover — without it we would never have seen the new Discovery or Range Rover Sport. And that would have been a shame. Clutch Pull away in third gear and the car should stall. If it doesn't then the clutch is slipping and needs replacing, a seven-hour job on a Maverick and a big bill to follow Turbo Diesel engine is turbocharged so check for blue smoke when accelerating: a sign that the turbo needs replacing Transmission Drive slowly on a good road surface to listen for transmission whines and groans, check the two-speed transfer box engages easily Facelift 1996 facelift included chrome grille and bonnet scoop. The post-1996 diesel models are the most desirable Security Ford did not fit alarm or immobiliser as standard Servicing Diesel engines need an oil change every 5,000 miles. Anything less is a false economy and will shorten the life of the turbo and the engine Air-conditioning A desirable option that many owners chose when the Maverick was new Safety Side-impact protection beams standard Front wheel bearings Tend to wear quickly so listen for grinding noise that changes as the vehicle quickens up Long wheelbase Makes the Maverick a more practical seven-seater and improves the vehicle's looks Brakes Check front discs for signs of pitting, grooves or ridges VITAL STATISTICS Model Ford Maverick 2.7TD GLS 5dr Engine 2663cc, 4-cylinder turbodiesel Power 123bhp Transmission Five-speed manual Fuel 26.9mpg (combined cycle) Acceleration 0-60mph: 16.7sec Top speed 96mph |
20-02-2008, 20:55 | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
Vehicle: LANDROVER Disco 300TDI
Posts: 1,802
|
review
hi mav .
thats a good review .rbrt sent me a photo copy of the original pre launch magazine review from 1993. rgds.iandouglas ps . mine was first registed in march 1993. believed to be a demonstraitor. used by nissan to introduce to there dealerships pre launch. |
20-02-2008, 21:51 | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 12,965
|
I remember them being developed, I worked at a Nissan dealership in Dewsbury and we read it in a car magazine one dinner time. I was hooked when I saw one in the flesh, I needed one but it took me nearly ten years before mine came along. First one I drove was a diesel SWB, went to the post office at a local supermarket to tax some cars. It was a wet day and guess what even new ones go sideways :twisted: . I have to say the ten years were worth the wait as she hasn't disapointed :
I told the wife a few weeks a go getting rid of the T2 would be like having an affair with another woman, I just wouldn't do it, unless it was for a younger model -rotfl- Jim T |
21-02-2008, 21:35 | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 549
|
I read that reveiw as well its good to revisit stuff, so people can get a chance to read reports that sometimes get forgotten.
i read that two years ago prior to buying my maverick. |
|
|