|
I'm new here, please be gentle This is where you can "introduce yourself". A chance for you as a new member to say hello and for you to tell us about yourselves, your truck and your other interests. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
14-12-2010, 20:52 | #61 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: peoples democratic republic of west yorkshire
Vehicle: " alice "
Posts: 10,473
|
i would be very interested in the technical side of things , ie ...emissions when running on svo/wvo... are they the same as diesel ? ..hydrocarbons etc ... i know diesel engines run on compression basis , but is the flash point of svo/wvo the same as diesel ? ..... im wondering about lubricating properties too .... perhaps you could enlighten ?
|
14-12-2010, 21:30 | #62 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: All hail to the Glove of Love...
Posts: 9,212
|
Quote:
Where did you get it tested out of interest, I'd like to do the same with some SVO..... But I'm suss about this 0.1 micron stuff....a particle that small is subject to Brownian Motion and it would be a very expensive filter that would pick that sort of thing up...in fact even the best oil filters are only about 15 microns or so, so why bother filtering stuff down to a hundredth of that size?? |
|
14-12-2010, 21:35 | #63 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: peoples democratic republic of west yorkshire
Vehicle: " alice "
Posts: 10,473
|
Quote:
|
|
15-12-2010, 00:52 | #64 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: dorset
Vehicle: mazda bongo,at the moment
Posts: 79
|
1St of all iam not trying to push filters,iam not even going to tell you where i get them from,i do this as a hobby.I find it all interesting,had great results.Spend hours and hours on this matter.
I am not on here to tell you to use oil in your car thats upto you to decide,wont get into that argument sorry but iam on a veg forum to much already.Will though try to help if any of you do need it. as for mot and exhaust tests,Its way way cleaner on veg.the guys at the mot bay think there is something wrong with thier machine,when you tell them your on veg they laugh and say ahh ok i see..could have said! next mot i will run 100% veg and get a print out to compare that on diesel My tests were sent off via a chap who iam testing filters for will try and find out the details for you. I dont pay a penny for the oil.... OK cant use in a new car but your car is one that is good for a conversion.(which is really the best wat to go)its down to the type of injection pump,some types are a no no and fail in a short time. The 0.1 is a very expensive pleated filter your right,its to do with reverse osmissis,it is not a common thing to use only a few of us are testing this micron,me and one other guy on wvo,and 2 on manking bio. The filters we used have effency ratings and tec back up from companys tec heads,we have tried maybe 20 different types and came to this so far 20 micron spun wound,1 micron spun wound,0.5 spun wound,0.1 pleated. but in summer i use a 1 micron melt blown filter,but this time of year its too slow for them 1 melt catches a bit more We have tried special carbon filters,they work but found the carbon ones didnt help on wvo in cold condition but did on bio,carbon black which is in oil from cooking needs to be removed to help when doing tests in freezer. Samples have been put in freezer and found after 12 then 24 hours oil was still runny clear and not frozen at -9oc It took 3-4 days before they want solid smaples were 500ml. Afer removing solid samples the recovery rate of the oil back to thin clear oil was amazing,at room temp the samples were back to nornaml in under 15mins..A probe was then put in the oil,the oil was at -5 when clear so was still cold. We did compare svo in the freezer,diesel mix,20,1 micron wvo ect ect. On preformance we found that the o.5 oil was the best,MUCH more power than 20,1 micron as most use. I gave oil to friends without telling them what i was upto,they said that they noticed a difference on power,then i told them. We found that there is a limmit to where you can filter to b4 removing the good bits out,and it was 0.5 When we went to 0.1 it was better in freezer,so better in winter,but the preformance drops a bit.not much but could be removing too much carbon. wvo has more power than svo due to carbon,but too much carbon can maybe cause oil to gel quicker. svo when produced is filterd to 9-10 microns. so kind of a trade off ,but at this time of the year i still to 0.1, 0.5 in summer, it takes me 4mins 30 seconds to pump 20 ltrs from ibc though filters in to a can at 0 oc,so quite slow but not terrible,so far on the same set of filters. Got a full on gear oil trasfer pump,thats veg reated as well,quite powerfull and pricey bit of kit. We are still working on it all and dont have all the answers,if we had the money would be able to do more science type tests in labs. Problem is there are so many varibles than effect info found ie type of oil,hoe it is stored,what it has been cooking ect ect ect,so results differ from testers,still make some progress anyway.and been fun Lastly for now,we noticed a improvement when you put oil through a second time,and even a 3rd no matter what filter you use,sock bag,ebay ect ect..so if you have a filter set up try it.and let me know if you can laterz jez |
15-12-2010, 01:35 | #65 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: dorset
Vehicle: mazda bongo,at the moment
Posts: 79
|
Quote:
wont remove water by filtration like this,but well settled oil has little water in it.I had a water bocker filter on set up but removed it as not neeed. There will be moisture in your diesel tank anyway. The tests that were done showd my water content was lower than the bio someone else made and they heat that stuff up . The reason why we wre able to test expensive filters was down to the fact the company who makes them wanted them tested on bio,wvo and we got them suppplied for free. sorry i cat expand to much on all the points,just way too much to type,will try and answer posts where i can. |
|
15-12-2010, 02:00 | #66 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Manchester
Vehicle: Ford Maverick 2.7 LWB GLX
Posts: 1,519
|
it cant be anything like reverse osmosis water i have dealt with this on the hobby side and it just wouldn't be feasible for you to run that way.
with ro for 1ltr of tap water you get about 250ml of ro water and this cant be re filtered and re filtered over and over due to the way it removes chemicals you can do a double in line ro membrane but this half's the life of the membrane, with trying to pass oil through a ro membrane you would be their for ever trying to get any usable fuel i have run 3 different ro units for my saltwater tank my fav was the automated one which had a self bleed system what are you actually trying to filter out ? if it was just debris etc then you would be better of with a hma water filter system which removes heavy metal content out of water, this is used primarily by discus owners, and uses 2/3 filters 1 5 micron and 1 1 micron and a coconut carbon filter the problem with ro water is it is completely striped of any useful minerals, |
15-12-2010, 10:58 | #67 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: All hail to the Glove of Love...
Posts: 9,212
|
Karl
Jez - Well it all sounds good stuff and an interesting hobby but what a bloody palaver when on the T2 you can just bang in modestly priced SVO, especially if bought in IBC quantities, at very high ratios without any modification. And it runs better AND you get a bit more oomph. And as Karl rightly says, at 0.1 microns you have no idea what beneficial components you might be stripping out as well.....but good to know your engine won't catch a virus LOL Still, horses for courses and all that. |
15-12-2010, 21:31 | #68 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: dorset
Vehicle: mazda bongo,at the moment
Posts: 79
|
It is 100% a 0.1 micron filter,costs about 70 quid at cost trade price! if i remember,so yes your right would not be worth it at diy level but i get full backing from company who makes them(prob same place you buy from) They wanted expensive filters testing on wvo and bio,we did the testing they provide the filters.
And it was not a pleated like i said it IS the membrane filter,I can prove thats what ive used if you really need me to i will have to have confirmation email of this from suppiler. It was done as a progression from all the different filter set ups we have tried,starting at the basic 20,1 micron that most use then on to 20,1 0.5 ect ect ect tried these sorts of set ups 20 spun,1melt,1melt, 0.5,spun 20 spun,1 spun,0.5 spun 20 spun 1 spun 0.5 spun 1 spun 20,spun ,1 melt,0.5,01 20 spun,1 ,spun,0.5,0.1 20 spun 1,spun,5 carbon duel media filter,0.5 The vegforum was where all the results are,its really heavy going as it got to something like 46 pages, of reading. The problem was as it was a masive thread it was hard to read and get info from,got quite a few digs about it was a waste of time ect ect ect.but hey the guys who make the filters were only trying to see if any improvements can be made on the way it was done in the past. Iam not saying you need to go as low as 0.1 at all,it was just for experement purpose anyway,we didnt know what it was going to do to oil,so whay not try??Thats how you learn.... maybe the 0.1 will remove more bacteria and nastys chemicals ect,and maybe the other filters we use remove more carbon. But what ever,its made the oil better in cold conditions,much clearer as for going to 0.5 we noticed that was still good in freezer tests,but better preformane when driving,I would say your find it hard to beat 20,1,0.5 on that. At the moment i only pass through filters once,no real need to pass again,we did it just to see on the standard 20,1 filters and that helped quite a bit. 20, and one micon oil is fine for use,i have used this for years in the past with no probs at all. Cant see me ever dropping the 0.5 and 20,1,0.5 maybe how iam going to use it in the futur when 0.1 blocks up Not sure i want to post to much on here about this,hope you dont mind but ive spend hours thashing out the pros and cons,Iam no way saying you need to go this mad or we have re invented the wheel but we have made progress all the same. would prob be best to keep to topic of the fantastic for terrano,sorry my head hurts...cant go though everything we have done |
15-12-2010, 21:41 | #69 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Manchester
Vehicle: Ford Maverick 2.7 LWB GLX
Posts: 1,519
|
Quote:
see a reverse osmosis membrane is a bit more complicated that just a filter the end product has been filtered down to 0.001 not 0.1 here is a pic of a ro membrane and a little chart for you look dont think i am digging at you as i am not i would be interested to see if a ro membrane can be used for oil as the last test we did was with a oil coated water tank and ti striped the oil content in the water if you take my chart here into consideration then you will see that with your filter being a 0.1 it is more like using hma water which has gone through a carbon filter |
|
16-12-2010, 00:10 | #70 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: dorset
Vehicle: mazda bongo,at the moment
Posts: 79
|
ok mate,no worries..
We were going to go super low filters to remove cryptosperidium, we didnt know if this could cuase a bug in the fuel or not help with gel issues. It was like the filter pic above but, from a different company(uk based).We were the 1st to try it on veg and bio in the uk..prob mosly down to cost i think! The 1st 3 filters were to remove carbon black and bigger bits. will check and get back to you on exact micron,but 0.001 does ring a bell,think maybe thats what it was and we have been calling it 0.1 all this time. think just cuz its easier to shorten to 0.1. Iam really 99% sure that it was a ro filter But will make sure ,will be HONEST with ya if iam wrong just we have tried so many i forget what we have done half the time!! Fefo no carbon in the one we used,as we are trying to remove it.we tried one with carbon with on my wvo had a negitive result on the gel point in the cold tests. rememebr it had a plastic mesh,and loads of layers ,different from the standard water ones we normally use(spun wound) which look like wool wrapped round and round on a roll. |
16-12-2010, 00:31 | #71 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wiltshire
Vehicle: Terrano 11 2.7Tdi SWB
Posts: 240
|
4wd
I have had various 4x4's from Land Cruiser,Hilux,Isuzu etc.Can't beat the Toyota except on price.So if you have lots of money ...! If not the Terrano is great.The last few weeks have been very slippery here in Ireland and the T2 never missed a trick.4wd was the order of the day when the roads were completely iced over and no problems at all when other lesser vehicles were going round and round.Today I was in 2wd and an ice remnant caught me on a corner.The back went out but it was easily brought back.I am a happy chappy,no complaints.
|
16-12-2010, 01:00 | #72 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Manchester
Vehicle: Ford Maverick 2.7 LWB GLX
Posts: 1,519
|
Quote:
if we got a 0.02 ppm on a tds(total dissolved solids) meter out of the ro membrane we would have a 4th or 6th canister filled with di resin this would bring down the tds to 0.000 as long as the resin hadn't gone past its absorption/filtration rate now if the ro membrane was pushing out 0.20 on the meter the resin would remove this but wouldn't last as long now for the engine to run i am not sure how low you want these tds figures, and as it isn't water is it able to reduced to just pure oil have a read of this if you are interested http://www.fiotec.com/leaflets.publi...of%20OWE-1.pdf now this does sort of bode with what i was saying about oil not passing through the ro membrane in a water system but if you was to utilize the waste product which would be oil and other mixes then it becomes a good way to remove the water in the oil running the unit in a waste wanted cycle would be beneficial in the collection of waste veg oil what sort or pressure you using to feed the membrane we had to have a pressure greater than 15psi with the average tap at around 30psi alot of people opted for a boost pump to run at 90psi |
|
16-12-2010, 10:16 | #73 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: dorset
Vehicle: mazda bongo,at the moment
Posts: 79
|
4wheel thanks mate..think its gona be t2..evryt ime we look at others we come back.
.................................................. ............................................. kbekl,there is no real need to go as low on tds as we have been just an experement,cant do any harm.svo is 10 micron the prusure we pump through fiters is nothing like what your talking about,20ltrs in 5 mins at 0 0c at moment!! in the summer its quick. what kind of stuff you working on bud sounds interesting? Some do use dry resin towers for bio as it removes more chemicals,but not common place,like iam sure you think the same but a lot of diy bio is total crap,bio is only as good as the guy who makes it,some only goto 5 micron. **i am the only one that manages to pump through that lot in cold weather,most guys use a cheap machine mart tam 105 and thay droped the (.1) way back,some even couldnt get through a 0.5** some guys who were testing found by going lower it changed the way they were making the stuff,but that was in the summer,i must chase them up now!bit different now i reckon... just waiting for a reply from supplier,should get a answer today on exaclty what we were on. This is spec of my transfer pump Piusi Part Number F0030401A Voltage 230vAC 50Hz Max Suction Lift 0 m Max Flow 9 lpm Outlet Pressure 25.0 Bar / 362 PSI Max Viscosity 2000 Centistokes Internal Bypass Yes Adjustable Bypass Yes Power Kw 0.75 RPM 1450 Max Liquid Temp 55° Max Room Temp 40° Ingress Protection IP55 Ports - Viscomat 1" BSP Female Weight 12.5 kg Thanks for info, all good.. |
16-12-2010, 10:20 | #74 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: dorset
Vehicle: mazda bongo,at the moment
Posts: 79
|
And this was results from sample sent of for testing
filtered waste oil to 0.1 Sample Date 15/06/2010 Sample # 1363538 Lab # 1363538 Analyst LEE BELL Unit Usage - hrs Oil Usage - hrs Oil Added - gus Wear 41 FW Idx - Idx 5 Contamination 30 Water K.Fish - ppm 735.0 ISO >2 - n/a 21 ISO >5 - n/a 17 ISO >15 - n/a 13 Cnts >2 - pml 10,588 Cnts >5 - pml 1,040 Cnts >15 - pml 61 Cnts >25 - pml 8 Cnts >30 - pml 4 Cnts >50 - pml 3 Cnts >75 - pml 2.0 Cnts >100 - pml 1.0 |
16-12-2010, 10:50 | #75 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Manchester
Vehicle: Ford Maverick 2.7 LWB GLX
Posts: 1,519
|
this is what the ro was used for
basicly if the water was less than perfect then certain things like corals etc would die when you are in the marine hobby you turn into a mini biochemist lol you need to be hot on a few things from phosphates to nitrates to salinity to ammonia silicates etc etc it gives you a headache when you first start lol the pumps we used 24 VDC / 29 VDC / 36 VDC / 48 VDC maximum Electric Current : 0.60A to 2A Outlet Water Pressure : 80PSI to 200 PSI producing about 400 gallons a day max |
|
|