|
The Clubs Virtual Pub For general chat, so come on in and pull up a chair. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-07-2007, 22:11 | #16 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Mr G
Please see the forum on Speedo reading; It was meant to be a reply to your plight but I stupidly gave it a different subject name. |
02-07-2007, 22:34 | #17 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Telford
Posts: 39
|
I have heard that the first thing to do when the ticket comes through is ask for a copy of the calibration certificate, to proove that the camera was within its calibration period when you were clocked. Apparently somthing like 30-40% of cameras are out of calibration at any one time, and if they can not prove the camera was calibrated they can not prosecute (but only if you ask the question). If you don't ask for the cretificate they will go ahead with the fixed penalty anyway, or if it goes to court the court will automatically assume that as it was/is not being challenges then all parties accept the the camera was calibrated so they will not ask for proof either. (guilty till proven inocent).
Rincewind |
02-07-2007, 23:07 | #18 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
the whole system is geared to scare you pay in x amount days £60 and 3 points or have time of work etc go to court an risk further penalties!
|
03-07-2007, 20:33 | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Merseyside
Posts: 1,048
|
Magistrates do have a lot of training & support, so it isn't really fiar to paint a picture of them being ignorant of the issues in front of them, and besides, the clerk of the court is employed to provide guidance on sentencing etc, and this has pretty much always been the case.
Re right to silence, there has been a test case in the european human rights court, about incriminating youself by having to declare the driver. Got thrown out, so there isn't a way of trying to use human rights law to support an unwillingness to provide details. Ultimately nowadays it just has to be seen that speeding is going to be punished, the best outcomes are going to be achieved through seeking appropriate legal advice. having said that, I'm not a lover of the cash cow machines on motorways etc, and I would like to see the urban speeders being caught more frequently. i do belive that there is a right time & place for speed, but the law diagrees. I have my own experiences of a near licence loosing court attendance for speeding on a quiet motorway with no adverse weather, in daylight (early morning) behind me, and find it very frustrating to stick to a 30 mph limit with people quite overtly exceeding the speed limt all around. |
03-07-2007, 20:53 | #20 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
yes around schools and built up areas there is a need for low speed limit but on open motorway in good conditions you shouldnt be punnished!
|
21-08-2007, 18:49 | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Central England, in the Heart of the Black Country
Vehicle: T2 2004 TDI SE LWB
Posts: 7,740
|
any more news on what happened with this :?:
|
21-08-2007, 20:40 | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,711
|
I forgot about Mr gadget & the flasher : If nothing has come through the door by now, it would not stand up in court as it's been over a month now :
|
21-08-2007, 20:46 | #23 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
alot don't have film :wink: just get flashed
|
21-08-2007, 20:51 | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Merseyside
Posts: 1,048
|
Quote:
In reality though they are pretty good at sending them out, so I would say Mr Gadget, if he didn't hear anything, was in the clear. |
|
|
|