|
The Clubs Virtual Pub For general chat, so come on in and pull up a chair. |
View Poll Results: Which 1 would you rather have....... | |||
The already owned Pajero | 8 | 40.00% | |
The Terrano which i think just needs hubs | 12 | 60.00% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 20. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
19-12-2010, 17:03 | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Roaming Nomad
Vehicle: 1995 SWB Terrano
Posts: 5,370
|
Please help.!
|
19-12-2010, 17:30 | #2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: devon
Vehicle: terrano 2.7tdi SE+ (X)reg
Posts: 1,674
|
Quote:
|
|
19-12-2010, 17:33 | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Central England, in the Heart of the Black Country
Vehicle: T2 2004 TDI SE LWB
Posts: 7,740
|
i prefer the t2 mate
|
19-12-2010, 17:38 | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Huddersfield
Vehicle: Terrano 03 LWB
Posts: 6,947
|
I dont know enough about Pajeros apart from what I hear, and i hear good things, but would you really want to risk battering a Pajero as good as that? nah, go for the Terrano if money allows it.
|
19-12-2010, 18:42 | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Manchester
Vehicle: Ford Maverick 2.7 LWB GLX
Posts: 1,519
|
bit of a daft question to ask a nissan forum as it will be a little bias lol
depends what you want to do is it to replace dirty frog ? or just as a drive around its a bit steep for a 94 altho time of year will affect the price |
19-12-2010, 20:08 | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Central England, in the Heart of the Black Country
Vehicle: T2 2004 TDI SE LWB
Posts: 7,740
|
|
19-12-2010, 20:10 | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Manchester
Vehicle: Ford Maverick 2.7 LWB GLX
Posts: 1,519
|
Quote:
|
|
19-12-2010, 20:11 | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Central England, in the Heart of the Black Country
Vehicle: T2 2004 TDI SE LWB
Posts: 7,740
|
if you'd seen the issues i've seen with 3.1 troopers you wouldn't mock, though i loved the old 2.8!
|
19-12-2010, 20:17 | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: west midlands
Vehicle: Maverick II 2.7 tdi (SWB)
Posts: 185
|
I think i know whats going to win here.
|
19-12-2010, 20:19 | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Manchester
Vehicle: Ford Maverick 2.7 LWB GLX
Posts: 1,519
|
|
19-12-2010, 20:24 | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Central England, in the Heart of the Black Country
Vehicle: T2 2004 TDI SE LWB
Posts: 7,740
|
Quote:
We had one 2.8 (j Plate) that did the best part of 50 mpg! amazing! |
|
19-12-2010, 20:30 | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Manchester
Vehicle: Ford Maverick 2.7 LWB GLX
Posts: 1,519
|
Quote:
the 2.8 was a great lump the 3.0 was a time bomb from injector problems to electrical was a night mare surprised you found the 3.1 sluggish its quicker than the t2 and has more power and torq, boat handling well it it rather large lol i have to admit the handling pack from lotus does make it stick to the road havnt lost the back end yet altho it makes it a bit harder to play off road, the t2 was a good motor but a little basic interior wise, i find the horn a much nicer place to sit |
|
19-12-2010, 20:32 | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Central England, in the Heart of the Black Country
Vehicle: T2 2004 TDI SE LWB
Posts: 7,740
|
Quote:
|
|
19-12-2010, 20:37 | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: essex
Vehicle: nissan mistral 27td
Posts: 1,043
|
t2
will it cost inxs of £750 to fix the dirty frog - me thinks not
you may be buying a pile of trouble. better a devil u know and all that paulp |
19-12-2010, 20:52 | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: moomin vally
Posts: 1,138
|
|
|
|