7 seater over Houndkirk

[Thomas-the-Terrano2]

had a 96 and 2004 7 seater, all have same fold up single piece rear seat. No headrests.

The Trol I had featured 2 third row seats that folded to side in a shogun and discovery
style. the trol's seats had holes for head rests though were missing in ours.

In the terrano we used graco booster seats, the type where you can remove the backrest
and has height adjustable integrated head rest cum seat belt guide. Good for upto about
eight year olds which is about all the leg room is fit for too.!

like this

http://www.toysrus.co.uk/babiesrus/g...PH4aAv898P8HAQ


we've got atleast four of them, decided to standardise on design so can mix n match
bases to back rest.

[ANGELO]

Cheers everyone for the info and thanks for the links

People carriers arent my thing, would much prefer to maintain my 7 seater duties in style with the terra or a troll .

[Thomas-the-Terrano2]

Originally Posted by ANGELO

Cheers everyone for the info and thanks for the links

People carriers arent my thing, would much prefer to maintain my 7 seater duties in style with the terra or a troll .

pathfinder is a good 7 seater, larger seats in 3rd row, plus fold flat into floor, with spare
underslung but body encompassing that area the boot is twice that of terrano even in 7
seat mode. just another to consider.

[Banshee]

Originally Posted by Thomas-the-Terrano2

pathfinder is a good 7 seater, larger seats in 3rd row, plus fold flat into floor, with spare
underslung but body encompassing that area the boot is twice that of terrano even in 7
seat mode. just another to consider.

I follow a dude on Instagram with a really tricked out 2005 Pathfinder in black and it looks fantastic!!!

[ANGELO]

Originally Posted by Thomas-the-Terrano2

pathfinder is a good 7 seater, larger seats in 3rd row, plus fold flat into floor, with spare
underslung but body encompassing that area the boot is twice that of terrano even in 7
seat mode. just another to consider.

Will do matey , I completely forgot about the Pathfinder.

I once had a long drawn out debate with a mate on whether the PF was a T2 replacement (like escort to focus) or was basically a Navara without the flatbed and nothing to do with the T2!

Never quite settled on an answer.

[Thomas-the-Terrano2]

I'd say though been out of my price range.


My only dissapointment in the pf is it hasn't sold like the t2 but that could be down to the overall shrinkage of the mid range suv market. Also I imagined there would have been more kit for it being as nissan worldwide family 4x4.

Suspect more folks have gone from t2 to kia sorrento than pf atleast as seen for caravan tugging.

[zippy656]

Originally Posted by Thomas-the-Terrano2

Suspect more folks have gone from t2 to kia sorrento than pf atleast as seen for caravan tugging.

The PF is just so over kill for tugging, so is the range rover Tbh.