|
The Clubs Virtual Pub For general chat, so come on in and pull up a chair. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
22-06-2013, 18:07 | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: South Yorkshire..
Vehicle: Nissan Terrano MK 2 SE
Posts: 1,757
|
The E-Bay advert.Describes the engine has having a timing chain.I could be wrong but i thought that instead of a chain it is gear driven.Anyone...
|
22-06-2013, 18:15 | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Staffs
Vehicle: '02 Terrano TDI sport lwb
Posts: 3,787
|
2.7 gears
3.0 chain |
22-06-2013, 18:18 | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: South Yorkshire..
Vehicle: Nissan Terrano MK 2 SE
Posts: 1,757
|
I stand corrected.
|
22-06-2013, 19:47 | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: North West
Vehicle: Patrol Y60
Posts: 217
|
If I was in the market for a Terrano I'd buy the cleanest 2.7 I could find and rustproof it to death with dinitrol.
I have worked on all manner of vehicles and one thing is certain, common rail is not the best. All my mechanic friends would agree with that too. I don't know exactly why but modern engines are just not as reliable as the last generation of injector pump equipped engines, and I'm not jus talking about Nissans here. Car forums are full of people referencing common rail sensor faults, limp modes and head gasket problems, that's not to say that there aren't hundreds of thousands of happy problem free people. I suspect that computer aided design has lead to engines being built with the minimum of material and squeezing the maximum performance both in terms of combined power and economy. Injectors and high pressure pumps are highly stressed and when they fail cost a fortune to repair. The technology is out there to make reliable stuff but cost is such an issue these days and I suspect motor manufacturers rely heavily on parts and servicing since they are trying to claw back manufacturing and design costs. We all know that there are some older engines that can and do enjoy incredible longevity, but they were no doubt designed by men using experience and slide rules/pocket calculators so they were over engineered. Of course they wouldn't pass modern emissions requirements because those very requirements have driven ever more complicated and expensive solutions to reducing what comes out of the exhaust and how much goes into the tank. Anyway, it's clear that like me, many people here favour the reliability and cost effectiveness of older engines, those things may not be any kind of issue for you. If you really want a 3 litre, then get one, the choice is yours and I can see why you prefer one, you're not on your own and at the end of the day everything that can go wrong is bolt on parts, just expensive bolt on parts. I'm certain that there will be a nice Terrano out there somewhere for you. |
22-06-2013, 19:59 | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Norfolk, Poringland NR14
Vehicle: Terrano 3.0 SVE 2002
Posts: 1,549
|
Quote:
__________________
Remember what the dormouse said: Feed your head.... |
|
22-06-2013, 20:11 | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: North West
Vehicle: Patrol Y60
Posts: 217
|
|
22-06-2013, 20:15 | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: surrey
Vehicle: Terrano 3.0 SVE
Posts: 100
|
Cheers Deano - some very good points there.
I work in the car service industry, but at the customer facing end, but engineering background, so spanners hold no fear for me. Repairs that are beyond my confidence can be entrusted to the technicians (as they are now called) where I work. Having said that, I'm much happier when I have a roll of duct tape and a hammer to repair my cars Oh yes, I've owned Landrovers before..... The internet is full of car forums, and all of them have horror stories to tell about particular derivatives of car, having particular problems. I shudder at work when a customer says he's seen on the internet that 'it's a common problem'. That doesn't make the customer wrong tho..... Manufacturers definitely rely on making money back from parts, as parts that aren't often changed, cost the earth, however its the dealer trying to maximise service costs for the customer, cos thats where the profit is. We don't want breakdowns, we want services, with extras such as brakes and tyres. Thats the gravy. Back to the point though, I really appreciate the helpful replies from everyone on here, and I do consider every opinion given. My problem is I am impatient. I want it NOW! Or possibly sooner. 3 grand and a V70 to sell are burning a hole in my pocket.... I'll probably change my mind once or twice more before I buy something So, all you helpful people, please don't think I am ungrateful, I appreciate all the help, and information, and hope to contribute more to the forum as I get to know whichever Terrano I buy.... |
22-06-2013, 20:42 | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: South Yorkshire..
Vehicle: Nissan Terrano MK 2 SE
Posts: 1,757
|
I am glad i bought my 2.7tdi.This is my 1st terry.And after doing research and chatting with some mates and a family member in the know.I was informed the this engine is almost bullet proof.
But as with any motor,you can get a wrong un.But like you have said.With money in pocket (Burning a hole in ya pocket)and a motor to sell.Dont be rash.It is a buyers market at the moment. I am on the look out for a second motor(Undecided as yet) |
23-06-2013, 11:31 | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Staffs
Vehicle: '02 Terrano TDI sport lwb
Posts: 3,787
|
|
23-06-2013, 12:49 | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Dundee, Scotland
Vehicle: 1990 4.2 SWB Safari
Posts: 2,615
|
|
23-06-2013, 15:02 | #26 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: surrey
Vehicle: Terrano 3.0 SVE
Posts: 100
|
Quote:
thats nice it would appear he has some heat resistant red paint, looking at the brakes that was advertised a week or two ago - but the ad has disappeared..... |
|
24-06-2013, 20:56 | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: South Bucks
Vehicle: Terrano 3.0 SVE 2005
Posts: 3,499
|
My 05 is much cleaner than my old 01 underneath, as for 2.7 v 3.0, had both and prefer the 3.0.
I didn't have issues with my 2.7 engine, but there are plenty of people on here who have and are suffering issues with them. Timing gears and chains are much better than rubber belts It's up to you what you buy, I know what I would go for |
25-06-2013, 08:27 | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: High Wycombe
Vehicle: Nissan Terrano 3.0di
Posts: 165
|
Why don't you take a test drive in one of each and get a feel for each engine? Any respectable dealer should let you out in a vehicle for 20mins.
|
25-06-2013, 18:53 | #29 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: surrey
Vehicle: Terrano 3.0 SVE
Posts: 100
|
Quote:
There's a plan, right there |
|
26-06-2013, 19:30 | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: surrey
Vehicle: Terrano 3.0 SVE
Posts: 100
|
and then pops up choice number 5....
blue ( wifey likey), 81k, 2003, ticks the boxes and 1.5 hours away if he's still got it at the weekend, I'lll be on my way.... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|