|
I'm new here, please be gentle This is where you can "introduce yourself". A chance for you as a new member to say hello and for you to tell us about yourselves, your truck and your other interests. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
28-09-2010, 17:32 | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: South West J9 M5
Vehicle: Mk1 Mav 2.4 & Mitsi J26
Posts: 39
|
Many thanks for the welcomes.
I agree regarding comments on the Pajero 2.5 v Maverick 2.4 as sane people would view them. However (are you sitting comfortably?) the Pajero was bought in a rush as my Jeep had blown it's Head Gasket 2 weeks after spending hard earned dosh on getting it through the MOT. There are only 3 of these outside of Japan which means I source my oparts from another owner who lives in Kyoto. So with a couple of brass farthings I needed another 4x4 quick. £950 was parted with for the Pajero. I then has a nice guy at POCUK check why the steering was so light when Lo ratio was selected. No front diff/prop I'd bought another unique Mitsubishi this time a 4x2 (which is why it's called Woody). So having now earned enough to consider the options and with icy roads comming it seemed to make more sense to get a 4x4 with 12 months Tax & MOT for less than £800 than spend even more getting the Pajero fixed, MOT'd Taxed and the mysterious oil leek sorted. As for comfort -my 1975 Mitsi J26 Jeep has bench seats and canvas top, a heater which emits less warmth than you'd get from rubbing a troop of boy scouts together and I used that every day for 2 winters. (I'm a freelance gardener working up in The Cotswolds). Top speed in the Jeep and Patero are about 60 - 65mph. So the Maverick positively makes my nose bleed with it's amasing power! As I say, sane people would view all this differently, Bern |
|
|