|
The Clubs Virtual Pub For general chat, so come on in and pull up a chair. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
14-01-2011, 15:29 | #31 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Central England, in the Heart of the Black Country
Vehicle: T2 2004 TDI SE LWB
Posts: 7,740
|
Quote:
For example, take a given truck and through an aerodynamic cab profile increase the fuel efficency by 10% and in doing so reduce its overall load capcity by 10% you now need 11 loads were there were 10 so 10% more trucks on the road and 10% more fuel used, not gains whatsoever. in these new fuel efficent times economy will drive design, but only to an extent it will allways be a compromise; my point in short: Whatever you bolt to your roof will afect fuel economy - full stop. and comparing it to a huge pantechnicon will not help! Now lets get back on topic |
|
14-01-2011, 15:32 | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Central England, in the Heart of the Black Country
Vehicle: T2 2004 TDI SE LWB
Posts: 7,740
|
[QUOTE=Fez_uk;126406]it will effect it but to say exactly how much is difficult.
QUOTE] spot on |
14-01-2011, 19:05 | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,705
|
|
14-01-2011, 19:10 | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,705
|
Definitely getting less mpg on mine on a mixed driving cycle with the supposed "aerodynamic" roof bars fitted.
Theres absolutely no dount that anything that disrupts the airflow will affect consumption. May be so neglible you wont know it I suppose. Thanks for the input, i posted the question before I logged off for the night and I cant believe the number of replies |
14-01-2011, 19:58 | #35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: WALES
Posts: 6,295
|
what you mean is you planted the seed before logging off, then left it for all the following inevitable disputes.
|
14-01-2011, 20:04 | #36 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,705
|
Quote:
no wouldnt do that. I just suspected there may have been someone had worked it out, I know it does affect it bt I just dont know how much by. I was reading up on those kenlowe heaters and theres one bloke worked out using it saves him 2.7mpg during the winter htf did he work that out so precisely |
|
15-01-2011, 17:57 | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: East Midlands
Vehicle: Maverick 4x4 2.7 TDI 97
Posts: 1,211
|
The maximum lenth for a Lorry on uk road is 16.5 meters, that is why the bull nose lorry never caught on here. They did have a few running tippers as they can get the weight up to 44 tons.
A UK road train, classed as a wagon and drag is 18.5 meters. Any how, this was about drag and fuel, YES the roof bars will increase you fuel consumption. I did say i was going to post tips on this but have not had the time to do it yet, as i want to make sure its right. But here are a few:- Dont let your car warm up before driving it, modern cars dont need it, just dont thrash it to death before its warm and its fine. Reverse into your driveway or garage, because the engine is warm it will use less fuel for this manover now than reversing out in the morning when its cold. Dont drive with your window open if its warm and you have aircon, Yes Aircon uses more fuel when its running than when its not, but having the windows open cause drag and that uses even more fuel. When in heavy traffic or at traffic lights turn the engine off, BMW have add this to some of their cars as standard, they just cut out when stood, then dip the clutch and they start back up and drive away. Just a few to be gettin on with, i will do a more detailed one soon. |
15-01-2011, 18:15 | #38 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,705
|
Quote:
The missus's SEAT Leon does that , its quite spooky at first but it does save a massive amount of fuel And as she refuses to have roof bars fitted ........................... |
|
15-01-2011, 18:22 | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Roaming Nomad
Vehicle: 1995 SWB Terrano
Posts: 5,370
|
Ya wind-up merchant
Unless ya ars sqeeks while ya walk to your vehicle As soon as you move its causing drag The more you put on or in its obvious its going to increase drag But i will stick to my words & say it doesnt make a difference, in the respect of it being noticeable to your fuel bill If you want fuel efficiently used then get a push bike |
15-01-2011, 18:51 | #40 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Central England, in the Heart of the Black Country
Vehicle: T2 2004 TDI SE LWB
Posts: 7,740
|
if i fill my tank and get 300 miles fomr it
then pot 33 inch tyres on and still get 300 miles is it possible the milometer is now out of calibration due to the wheel size change, if the speedo reads diffreent then so will the milage? |
15-01-2011, 18:56 | #41 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Roaming Nomad
Vehicle: 1995 SWB Terrano
Posts: 5,370
|
|
15-01-2011, 19:00 | #42 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: on the beach WEST WALES
Vehicle: Maverick TDi BLACK mmm
Posts: 15,136
|
Quote:
I know with all my mods I'm still around 26 to the gallon Which I'm quite happy with as I've got lead soled boots and roof lights and 'king heavy winch and it runs on bio at 82p a litre |
|
15-01-2011, 19:28 | #43 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Central England, in the Heart of the Black Country
Vehicle: T2 2004 TDI SE LWB
Posts: 7,740
|
Quote:
I think the key phrase in all of this is about, GPS (with a mileometer? ) or not. There is no way to tell unless the difference is pretty large. |
|
15-01-2011, 19:31 | #44 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Roaming Nomad
Vehicle: 1995 SWB Terrano
Posts: 5,370
|
Quote:
GPS is the only way |
|
15-01-2011, 21:37 | #45 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Rugeley Staffordshire
Posts: 233
|
My Mav's got standard wheels and tyres, got roof bars across the top, filled up today it worked out to 32 mpg. Mind you I've driven like my grandma on the last tank.
illy |
|
|