PDA

View Full Version : censorship of posts


briggie
26-01-2011, 00:16
do you want or agree that posts should be censored ?

harlowmaverick
26-01-2011, 00:21
i voted no, freedom of speach rocks:thumb2

extreme-4x4
26-01-2011, 00:30
should i close this thread ? :D:augie

jace
26-01-2011, 00:32
no censorship it goes back to the dark ages!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bfgn2lOSx6M
was sent to me yrs ago by a higher being lol

Peasgood
26-01-2011, 00:41
No, posts should not be censored.
The members should not post offensive things and if they do the post should be moderated.
A very different thing to censorship, but relies on good moderators.

solarman216
26-01-2011, 00:49
No, posts should not be censored.
The members should not post offensive things and if they do the post should be moderated.
A very different thing to censorship, but relies on good moderators.

Agreed, we do not need censorship, freedom of speech and expression, is the norm in this country and I will fight for it to stay that way, Rick

briggie
26-01-2011, 00:52
totally agree rick , except when it descends into personal name calling /personal abuse or extremely offensive remarks on a personal level

tezzer
26-01-2011, 00:54
censorship is not needed on here, if you don't like the sound of the post ,dont open it, it's that easy :nenau:thumb2

Peasgood
26-01-2011, 00:55
totally agree rick , except when it descends into personal name calling /personal abuse or extremely offensive remarks on a personal level

That is moderation, not censorship (you tit :D)

extreme-4x4
26-01-2011, 00:56
thats what moderators are here for. i have had no complaints recently and WILL act if any complaints are received .

have i missed something ?????

briggie
26-01-2011, 00:57
and thats how it should be ...... now who mentioned tits ? :naughty

tezzer
26-01-2011, 00:58
totally agree rick , except when it descends into personal name calling /personal abuse or extremely offensive remarks on a personal level

but i dont think it has, as yet and probably wont, we are not making personnel remarks about / to individuals, i cant see any problem, im sure bat21 would soon nip it in the bud if it got out of hand. :thumbs

Peasgood
26-01-2011, 01:04
have i missed something ?????
Not that I have noticed. :thumb2

briggie
26-01-2011, 01:06
anyway ....... back to tits ......:naughty

extreme-4x4
26-01-2011, 01:06
phewww. only id hate to make a tit of myself :nenau

briggie
26-01-2011, 01:10
http://i1025.photobucket.com/albums/y311/phuctiphino/MotivationalPoser.jpg

tezzer
26-01-2011, 01:11
your disgusting pete, but i like your idea. :lol

makeitfit
26-01-2011, 01:31
your disgusting pete, but i like your idea. :lol
That filth should be deleted :p
Keep those tits Nissan please ;)
<iframe title="YouTube video player" class="youtube-player" type="text/html" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/zKO-tZGuFDg" frameborder="0" allowFullScreen></iframe>

wren3678
26-01-2011, 01:48
So who got hold of this photo of my missus!!! lmao!! :)

extreme-4x4
26-01-2011, 02:03
So who got hold of this photo of my missus!!! lmao!! :)

we all have one . i have my copy as my screen saver :thumbs

makeitfit
26-01-2011, 02:05
we all have one . i have my copy as my screen saver :thumbs
I keeep telling you, close the screen to save it .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. ............getting sticky :p

clivvy
26-01-2011, 08:45
I vote a big resounding YES.....




































TO TITS.

Thomas-the-Terrano2
26-01-2011, 11:35
childish but funny.

lacroupade
26-01-2011, 12:42
There are only two elements to this argument as far as I am concerned:

1. This is effectively a chat room on a pay-to-view web site on the bloody internet so IMHO the only 'out of order' stuff is personal abuse (which would have to be serious as opposed to just name-calling), physical threats or something unacceptably illegal. Other than that, freedom of speech should be the order of the day - and as people have said, I've yet to see anything get out of hand.

2. BUT and its a big BUT, whether its for the sake of Bats server revenue, or our personal/joint reputations (I use my moniker on other forums), we should ensure that we act and speak like proper grown-ups. Just try googling your username and see what pops up......:eek:

clivvy
26-01-2011, 14:21
There are only two elements to this argument as far as I am concerned:

1. This is effectively a chat room on a pay-to-view web site on the bloody internet so IMHO the only 'out of order' stuff is personal abuse (which would have to be serious as opposed to just name-calling), physical threats or something unacceptably illegal. Other than that, freedom of speech should be the order of the day - and as people have said, I've yet to see anything get out of hand.

2. BUT and its a big BUT, whether its for the sake of Bats server revenue, or our personal/joint reputations (I use my moniker on other forums), we should ensure that we act and speak like proper grown-ups. Just try googling your username and see what pops up......:eek:

I agreemate, some respect should be considered at all times, to the site, and folk using it.

makeitfit
26-01-2011, 14:22
Just try googling your username and see what pops up......:eek:
No time to check yours :lol
Put mine in and was a little shocked :eek:
Photobucket link came up, no worries:rolleyes:
UKPOLICEONLINE was next thing I found :doh
I'm off for another coffee now, thanks Luvgluv :o

lacroupade
26-01-2011, 14:22
No time to check yours :lol
Put mine in and was a little shocked :eek:
Photobucket link came up, no worries:rolleyes:
UKPOLICEONLINE was next thing I found :doh
I'm off for another coffee now, thanks Luvgluv :o

scary isn't it!

Deleted account DD
26-01-2011, 20:45
No censoring. This is a forum populated by some decent fair minded people and generally decency shines through.

The only caveat is if in the mods opinion a post is unlawful it should go because vbulletin may start getting twitchy (is that the provider??) otherwis let it run.

Try this one as well as google, it goes deeper on names only :augie

http://www.pipl.com/

R1cho
26-01-2011, 20:54
Just try googling your username and see what pops up......:eek:

erm, i got this

1. A method for producing an 1-iodoalkyl acylate of the formula: ##STR23## wherein R1 hydrogen, a straight-chain or branched alkyl group of 1 to 6 carbon atoms, or a cycloalkyl group of 3 to 7 carbon atoms and R2 is a cycloalkyl group of 3 to 7 carbon atoms, a straight-chain or branched alkyl group of 1 to 10 carbon atoms, which is non-substituted or substituted by phenyl or a cycloalkyl group of 3 to 7 carbon atoms, which comprises reacting a compound of the formula: R1 CHO

:nenau

lacroupade
26-01-2011, 23:50
erm, i got this

1. A method for producing an 1-iodoalkyl acylate of the formula: ##STR23## wherein R1 hydrogen, a straight-chain or branched alkyl group of 1 to 6 carbon atoms, or a cycloalkyl group of 3 to 7 carbon atoms and R2 is a cycloalkyl group of 3 to 7 carbon atoms, a straight-chain or branched alkyl group of 1 to 10 carbon atoms, which is non-substituted or substituted by phenyl or a cycloalkyl group of 3 to 7 carbon atoms, which comprises reacting a compound of the formula: R1 CHO

:nenau

not when you type it correctly you don't LOL